Which of the following statements correctly describes re-evaluation after remediation under AR 600-9?

• A. After remediation, no further monitoring is required.
• B. The standard can never be re-evaluated after remediation.
• C. Re-evaluation occurs as the soldier returns to duty, to determine if further remediation is needed.
• D. The soldier must complete a separate medical board after remediation.

Answer: (C)

Re-evaluation after remediation is the process used to verify whether a soldier’s body composition now meets standards once they have completed remediation. The idea is to check, when the soldier returns to duty, if the remediation efforts achieved compliance or if additional steps are needed. This keeps the management of body composition standards active and ensures ongoing accountability.

Why this fits: the purpose of remediation is to bring a soldier into compliance, and re-evaluation on return to duty confirms whether that goal was met and guides any next actions. The other statements don’t align with AR 600-9 because monitoring continues after remediation (it isn’t a one-off check), the standard can be re-evaluated as part of the process, and a separate medical board isn’t automatically required solely because remediation was completed.